- Joined
- Aug 21, 2016
- Messages
- 1,761
- Reaction score
- 1,118
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Radelaide SA , Australia
I'd also get feedback from proper judges , chance to make it better next time
That's the same thing I found in my local club. I'm sure there are plenty of those club members who are more knowledgeable than I am, but every time I talked to someone different at their meeting, each started by saying, "That guy doesn't know what he's talking about. Here's what you need to know."First club had too many self appointed experts , I gave one a commercial Grolsch swingtop and told him it was a kit based beer .....according to him it was phenolic , with traces of DMS and diacetyl
I like what they're doing in a generic sense. As science, not very much. There's generally no attempt at reproducing a result. I'll take what they do with a grain of salt, might try it in my own brew but as brewing science, I'll accept what the Germans have been doing for 300 years (with benefit of much research) as gospel.i don't place a great deal of weight on brulosophy experiments , few guys in a shed and regularly have mixed and subjective results
i do read and enjoy them but then i sometimes watch WWF wrestling so i take them at face value
Someone handed me a commercial Miller a while back. I couldn't get past the DMS. Tasted like reheated creamed corn, if you can imagine that.Different people have different thresholds for these substances , i can taste it at moderate levels as i found out
others lower thresholds and some not at all
Not exactly a danger to the craft beer sales figures thenSomeone handed me a commercial Miller a while back. I couldn't get past the DMS. Tasted like reheated creamed corn, if you can imagine that.