lol, to be fair a shellfish allergy can be pretty serious. far more so then your average gluten free(beyond actual celiac's disease).
I get what you are saying, but if i didnt tell you, you would not have any idea. generally speaking as long as the beer fits the flavor profile that it is claiming, it doesnt matter how you get there. a great example is the cold fermenting Chico yeast to make a "lager" or warm fermenting a lager yeast to make it fall into the ale spectrum. Lots of breweries just add lactic/citric/acetic acids to their beers to make them sour.
exactly. if i am able to produce a good version without the shells, i would not have to deal with the allergy issues.
commercial systems require ALOT more effort and chemicals to clean then a homebrew setup. a 30bbl required something like >10 gals of caustic, >2gals of hydrogen peroxide booster, >10 gals of acid, 300gals of water and several hours todo a full CIP. The CIP would be pretty expensive per batch if it was required.
Im not trying to be a dick, but its not deceptive marketing. If i did add oysters, i wouldnt list the quantity. If i didnt say that i added oysters then that that was just the assumption. If the flavor matches the expectation, what is the problem?
The next issue, probably the biggest is that by not adding(or adding a token amount of shells) and using sea salt post fermentation, I have the ability to scale the recipe and produce consistent, repeatable batches. I have no way of measuring the salt and minerals added by the shells, so i wont have the same level of repeatability. If i was only looking at producing this once a year, you would never taste a variation. I am looking at doing this beer as a year around product, so i need each batch to be consistent. plus oysters are seasonal, so i may not be able to get the same shells in july as i can in december.
Not trying to be a dick with these comments, but trying to work through my reasonings.