Imperial NZ/Australian-Hopped Red Ale - Beer Recipe - Brewer's Friend

Brewer's Friend

Print

Imperial NZ/Australian-Hopped Red Ale

272 calories 26.1 g 12 oz
Beer Stats
Method: All Grain
Style: American Strong Ale
Boil Time: 60 min
Batch Size: 5 gallons (fermentor volume)
Pre Boil Size: 8 gallons
Pre Boil Gravity: 1.052 (recipe based estimate)
Efficiency: 70% (brew house)
Source: Pandy Grelps
Calories: 272 calories (Per 12oz)
Carbs: 26.1 g (Per 12oz)
Created: Saturday March 12th 2016
1.082
1.018
8.5%
125.8
18.5
n/a
n/a
 
Fermentables
Amount Fermentable Cost PPG °L Bill %
14.50 lb United Kingdom - Golden Promise14.5 lb Golden Promise 37 3 90.1%
1 lb American - Caramel / Crystal 80L1 lb Caramel / Crystal 80L 33 80 6.2%
0.50 lb American - Caramel / Crystal 120L0.5 lb Caramel / Crystal 120L 33 120 3.1%
1.50 oz American - Black Malt1.5 oz Black Malt 28 500 0.6%
16.09 lbs / 0.00
 
Hops
Amount Variety Cost Type AA Use Time IBU Bill %
1 oz Warrior1 oz Warrior Hops Pellet 18 Boil 60 min 67.5 16.7%
0.50 oz Pacific Jade0.5 oz Pacific Jade Hops Pellet 13.1 Boil 45 min 22.55 8.3%
0.30 oz Galaxy0.3 oz Galaxy Hops Pellet 14.25 Boil 10 min 5.81 5%
0.50 oz Pacific Jade0.5 oz Pacific Jade Hops Pellet 13.1 Boil 10 min 8.91 8.3%
0.70 oz Galaxy0.7 oz Galaxy Hops Pellet 14.25 Boil 5 min 7.46 11.7%
0.50 oz Wakatu0.5 oz Wakatu Hops Pellet 7.1 Boil 5 min 2.65 8.3%
1 oz Summer1 oz Summer Hops Pellet 5.6 Whirlpool at 140 °F 15 min 6.71 16.7%
0.50 oz Wakatu0.5 oz Wakatu Hops Pellet 7.1 Whirlpool at 140 °F 15 min 4.25 8.3%
1 oz Wakatu1 oz Wakatu Hops Pellet 7.1 Dry Hop 7 days 16.7%
6 oz / 0.00
 
Other Ingredients
Amount Name Cost Type Use Time
1 tsp Gypsum Water Agt Mash --
 
Yeast
White Labs - California Ale Yeast WLP001
Amount:
1 Each
Cost:
Attenuation (custom):
80%
Flocculation:
Medium
Optimum Temp:
68 - 73 °F
Starter:
No
Fermentation Temp:
70 °F
Pitch Rate:
0.35 (M cells / ml / ° P) 131 B cells required
0.00 Yeast Pitch Rate and Starter Calculator
 
Target Water Profile
Boston, MA
Ca+2 Mg+2 Na+ Cl- SO4-2 HCO3-
4 1 31 19 9 41
Mash Chemistry and Brewing Water Calculator
 
Mash Guidelines
Amount Description Type Start Temp Target Temp Time
Sacch Rest (Step 1) Infusion -- 146 °F 30 min
Sacch Rest (Step 2) Infusion -- 155 °F 60 min
Starting Mash Thickness: 1.5 qt/lb
Quick Water Requirements
Water Gallons  Quarts
Strike water volume at mash thickness of 1.5 qt/lb 6.04 24.1  
Mash volume with grains 7.32 29.3  
Grain absorption losses -2.01 -8  
Remaining sparge water volume (equipment estimates 2.91 g | 11.7 qt) 4.23 16.9  
Mash Lauter Tun losses -0.25 -1  
Pre boil volume (equipment estimates 6.69 g | 26.8 qt) 8 32  
Boil off losses -1.5 -6  
Hops absorption losses (first wort, boil, aroma) -0.13 -0.5  
Post boil Volume 5.06 20.2  
Hops absorption losses (whirlpool, hop stand) -0.06 -0.2  
Going into fermentor 5 20  
Total: 10.26 41
Equipment Profile Used: System Default
 
Notes

A strong red ale with aggressive bitterness from US Warrior/NZ Pacific Jade balanced by semi-sweet malt and notes of stone fruit, pine and citrus derived from a combination of NZ/Australian hops.

3/13/16: Brew day went well. Hit all temps pretty dead-on. Collected 8 gallons and boiled down to 6 before starting the true boil/adding the initial hop addition. Pre and post-boil gravity were dead on. Did a 20 minute whirlpool/hop stand after chilling to 140 F, then continued chilling to pitch temp. We're assuming 80% attenuation with WLP001 as we usually do very well with it. Here's to hoping. We'll probably dry-hop with another oz of Wakatu in the coming week. Cheers!

3/18/16: Only been 5 days in the fermenter but activity has seemingly slowed down to a crawl. Pulled a sample to check and it's still sitting at about 1.022-23. We'll give it another week and probably rack and dry-hop it then. Tasting somewhat rough-around-the-edges... definitely too sweet (which makes sense given the gravity currently), but it's actually pretty bitter and flavorful regardless. I'm getting a hefty dose of pine as well as stone and tropical fruits. So far I'd say this one's going quite well and will probably end up very solid. -A

4/16/16: Finally drinking a properly-matured bottle of this. Glad we didn't call it an IPA as we were pretty sure it wouldn't come out that way anyway. It's definitely malt-focused but balanced by a resinous, piney bitterness and unique dark fruit character (dates come to mind).

6/7/16: Just opened another bottle of this one that's been in the fridge for a while. Been a few months since it was bottled so hopefully it's come into its own.

A: Hard pour results in a few fingers of decently-retentive head. Good deep-ruby color, almost garnet-like, if a little darker, when held up to direct light. Head is kind of a khaki color. Surface is hazy and wispy.

S: Lots of toffee and treacle, dates and other dark stone fruit plus some undercurrents of botanical/floral character, lime seltzer and dried herbs. Wakatu probably was not the right varietal to dry-hop this with, all things considered, and I'm realizing this now. Since it's essentially just New Zealand's version of Hallertau, it has kind of a noble-hop aroma and didn't add as much heady citrus/tropical as we wanted in the final product. All things considered, this still smells like a solid imperial red ale.

T: Still lots of English toffee, some ethanol, pine and herbal notes, pie crust, a bit of citrus peel. Just tastes a bit too muddled and undefined to me. Bitterness is seemingly high but doesn't translate into anything special on the palate, making this feel kind of dull. We'll probably have to rethink this recipe quite a bit to get what we want out of it. It's quite drinkable and even enjoyable, but I'm too struck by what could have been instead of being excited about what actually became, and that's never a great sign.

M: I'd say we actually succeeded very well at making a "strong ale" with an amber ale bent that retains good, slick feel and drinkability, however. Probably one of this beer's strong suits. In a sense, this reminds me (and Pat, as I recall) of an intensified Irish red ale.

O: We will probably do something of this sort again, but change it to the point that it's likely going to be nothing like this. That said, I think I'll end up wanting to keep the malt bill rather the same. This is good beer, realistically, but just not what we wanted. I would like to achieve both "good beer" and "beer the way we want it from conception to actualization," so this is essentially a failure as it's only "half done" by that standard. -A

Last Updated and Sharing
 
1,077
Views
0
Brews
Recipe QR Code
  • Public: Yup, Shared
  • Last Updated: 2016-06-07 22:35 UTC